CCE-CBD-011

CASE INFORMATION

Case ID: GORD-008
Case Name: Daniel White
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Indigenous Status: Non-Indigenous
Year: 2025
ICPC-2 Codes: D84 (Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease), D99 (Dyspepsia/Indigestion)​.

COMPETENCY OUTCOMES

Competency DomainCompetency Element
1. Communication and Consultation Skills1.1 Engages the patient to explore symptoms, triggers, and concerns. 1.2 Provides clear explanations about GORD, lifestyle modifications, and treatment options.
2. Clinical Information Gathering and Interpretation2.1 Takes a thorough history to differentiate GORD from other upper gastrointestinal conditions.
3. Diagnosis, Decision-Making and Reasoning3.1 Uses clinical criteria to diagnose GORD and determine the need for investigations.
4. Clinical Management and Therapeutic Reasoning4.1 Develops an evidence-based management plan, including pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies.
5. Preventive and Population Health5.1 Provides lifestyle modification advice to prevent symptom progression and complications.
6. Professionalism6.1 Uses a patient-centred approach, respecting individual concerns and treatment preferences.
7. General Practice Systems and Regulatory Requirements7.1 Understands guidelines for proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and deprescribing.
8. Procedural Skills8.1 Recognises indications for upper endoscopy and referral criteria.
9. Managing Uncertainty9.1 Identifies red flag symptoms that require urgent investigation.
10. Identifying and Managing the Patient with Significant Illness10.1 Recognises complications of chronic GORD, such as Barrett’s oesophagus.

CASE FEATURES

  • 42-year-old male presenting with heartburn and regurgitation for 6 months.
  • Symptoms worse after meals and at night, relieved with antacids.
  • History of overweight (BMI 31), frequent alcohol intake, and high-fat diet.
  • No alarming symptoms, but requires risk assessment and management.
  • Needs lifestyle advice, trial of medical therapy, and possible investigations.

INSTRUCTIONS

Review the following patient record summary and scenario.

Your examiner will ask you a series of questions based on this information.

You have 15 minutes to complete this case.

The time for each question will be managed by the examiner.

The time allocation for each question is roughly as follows:

  • Question 1 – 3 minutes
  • Question 2 – 3 minutes
  • Question 3 – 3 minutes
  • Question 4 – 3 minutes
  • Question 5 – 3 minutes

PATIENT RECORD SUMMARY

Patient Details

Name: Daniel White
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Indigenous Status: Non-Indigenous

Allergies and Adverse Reactions

  • Nil known

Medications

  • Over-the-counter antacids PRN

Past History

  • Dyspepsia in the past, but no formal diagnosis of GORD
  • Overweight (BMI 31)

Social History

  • Works as a real estate agent, frequently eats out.
  • Diet high in fatty foods, coffee, and spicy meals.
  • Alcohol intake: 10-12 standard drinks per week.
  • No regular exercise.
  • Stressed due to work pressure.

Family History

  • Father had peptic ulcer disease.
  • No family history of oesophageal cancer.

Smoking

  • Smoked in his 20s but quit 15 years ago.

Alcohol

  • 10-12 standard drinks per week.

Preventative Activities

  • No previous gastroscopy.
  • No regular GP check-ups.

SCENARIO

Daniel White, a 42-year-old male, presents with persistent heartburn and regurgitation for six months. Symptoms are worse after large meals and at night but improve with antacids. He denies dysphagia, weight loss, vomiting, or haematemesis.

He has gained weight in the past two years, frequently drinks alcohol and eats fatty, spicy foods. He has not tried medical therapy and is concerned about long-term complications.

On examination:

General Appearance: Overweight, well-appearing
Blood Pressure: 128/82 mmHg
Heart Rate: 76 bpm, regular
Abdominal Examination: No tenderness or masses
Oropharynx: No signs of candidiasis or ulceration

Daniel asks whether he needs an endoscopy and is worried about oesophageal cancer.

EXAMINER ONLY INFORMATION

QUESTIONS

Q1. What additional history would you take to assess Daniel’s symptoms?

  • Prompt: What key features help differentiate GORD from other upper GI conditions?
  • Prompt: What red flag symptoms require urgent investigation?

Q2. What investigations, if any, would you order to assess Daniel’s condition?

  • Prompt: When is an upper endoscopy indicated?
  • Prompt: What tests can support a diagnosis of GORD?

Q3. Outline an initial management plan, including lifestyle and pharmacological interventions.

  • Prompt: What lifestyle modifications would you recommend?
  • Prompt: How would you use proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) safely?

Q4. How would you educate Daniel on his diagnosis and long-term management?

  • Prompt: How would you reassure him about his cancer concerns?
  • Prompt: What is the role of ongoing follow-up in GORD?

Q5. Daniel returns in three months with persistent symptoms despite lifestyle changes and PPI therapy. What would you do next?

  • Prompt: What are the next steps in his management?
  • Prompt: When would you refer him to a gastroenterologist?

THE COMPETENT CANDIDATE

The competent candidate should be able to:

Q1: What additional history would you take to assess Daniel’s symptoms?

A thorough history is essential to assess Daniel’s symptoms, differentiate gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) from other conditions, and identify red flags.

1. Symptom Characteristics:

  • Onset, duration, and frequency of symptoms.
  • Triggers: Fatty meals, alcohol, caffeine, lying down.
  • Associated symptoms: Regurgitation, dysphagia, nausea.

2. Red Flag Symptoms (Possible Oesophageal Cancer or Peptic Ulcer Disease):

  • Unintentional weight loss.
  • Persistent vomiting or haematemesis.
  • Dysphagia or odynophagia.
  • Family history of oesophageal or gastric cancer.

3. Lifestyle and Risk Factors:

  • Diet: Spicy/fatty foods, late-night eating.
  • Alcohol and smoking history.
  • Physical activity and weight trends.

4. Medication Use:

  • Overuse of NSAIDs or corticosteroids (risk of ulcers).
  • Previous trial of acid suppression therapy.

5. Psychosocial Factors:

  • Stress, anxiety, or work-related pressures.
  • Impact on sleep and quality of life.

A structured history ensures accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.


Q2: What investigations, if any, would you order to assess Daniel’s condition?

Investigations should be guided by symptoms and red flag features.

1. When to Consider Investigations:

  • Typical GORD symptoms (no red flags): Empirical treatment trial (PPI).
  • Red flag symptoms: Require urgent gastroscopy.
  • Atypical symptoms (chronic cough, laryngitis, chest pain): May need further assessment.

2. Diagnostic Tests:

  • Gastroscopy: If red flags, poor response to treatment, or long-standing symptoms (>5 years).
  • 24-hour pH monitoring: If diagnosis is uncertain.
  • H. pylori testing (faecal antigen, breath test): If ulcer disease suspected.

Appropriate investigations confirm diagnosis and guide treatment.


Q3: Outline an initial management plan, including lifestyle and pharmacological interventions.

Management should be individualised and evidence-based.

1. Lifestyle Modifications (First-Line):

  • Weight loss if overweight (BMI 31).
  • Dietary changes: Avoid fatty/spicy foods, alcohol, caffeine.
  • Meal timing: Eat 2-3 hours before bed, smaller portions.
  • Smoking cessation and reducing alcohol intake.
  • Elevating bed head, avoiding tight clothing.

2. Pharmacological Therapy:

  • Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) Trial: Omeprazole or esomeprazole once daily for 4-8 weeks.
  • Antacids or H2 blockers (ranitidine) for breakthrough symptoms.

3. Monitoring and Follow-Up:

  • Review in 4-8 weeks.
  • If symptoms persist despite lifestyle and PPI use, consider gastroscopy.

A stepwise approach ensures symptom control and prevention of complications.


Q4: How would you educate Daniel on his diagnosis and long-term management?

Patient education is key to long-term symptom control.

1. Reassurance and Explanation:

  • GORD is common and manageable with lifestyle and medication.
  • Low risk of oesophageal cancer, but monitoring is important.

2. Long-Term Management:

  • Identify and avoid triggers (e.g., diet, alcohol, smoking).
  • Use PPIs correctly: Take before meals, reassess need periodically.
  • Taper PPIs when symptoms improve to avoid long-term risks.

3. Follow-Up and When to Seek Help:

  • Persistent symptoms despite treatment → Review for escalation.
  • New red flag symptoms → Urgent referral.

Empowering the patient with knowledge and strategies improves adherence and outcomes.


Q5: Daniel returns in three months with persistent symptoms despite lifestyle changes and PPI therapy. What would you do next?

Daniel’s persistent symptoms require further evaluation and management escalation.

1. Assess for PPI Failure:

  • Confirm adherence: Is he taking PPIs 30 minutes before meals?
  • Optimise therapy: Increase to twice daily dosing for 4-8 weeks.

2. Consider Differential Diagnoses:

  • Functional dyspepsia or non-acid reflux.
  • Oesophageal motility disorder.
  • Biliary or peptic ulcer disease.

3. Indications for Referral to Gastroenterologist:

  • Persistent symptoms despite optimised therapy.
  • Recurrent regurgitation or nocturnal reflux.
  • Suspected Barrett’s oesophagus (GORD >5 years, overweight, male).

4. Alternative Treatments:

  • H2 receptor antagonists (ranitidine) or prokinetics.
  • Consider anti-reflux surgery (fundoplication) in severe refractory cases.

Early specialist input prevents long-term complications and improves quality of life.


SUMMARY OF A COMPETENT ANSWER

  • Thorough history-taking covering symptoms, lifestyle, and red flags.
  • Judicious use of investigations, considering gastroscopy if indicated.
  • Stepwise management with lifestyle, PPI therapy, and monitoring.
  • Effective patient education about triggers, long-term management, and follow-up.
  • Timely referral for persistent or atypical symptoms.

PITFALLS

  • Failing to assess red flags, delaying investigation of serious pathology.
  • Not optimising PPI use, leading to inadequate symptom control.
  • Over-reliance on medication without addressing lifestyle factors.
  • Delaying specialist referral in refractory or high-risk cases.
  • Inadequate patient education, leading to poor adherence and recurrence.

REFERENCES


MARKING

Each competency area is on the following scale from 0 to 3.

☐ Competency NOT demonstrated
☐ Competency NOT CLEARLY demonstrated
☐ Competency SATISFACTORILY demonstrated
☐ Competency FULLY demonstrated

Competency at Fellowship Level

☐ CLEARLY BELOW STANDARD
☐ BELOW EXPECTED STANDARD
☐ BORDERLINE
☐ AT EXPECTED STANDARD
☐ ABOVE STANDARD