CASE INFORMATION
Case ID: DEP-004
Case Name: Sarah Thompson
Age: 29
Gender: Female
Indigenous Status: Non-Indigenous
Year: 2025
ICPC-2 Codes: P76 (Depressive Disorder), P03 (Feeling Depressed).
COMPETENCY OUTCOMES
Competency Domain | Competency Element |
---|---|
1. Communication and Consultation Skills | 1.1 Engages the patient to gather information about their symptoms and psychosocial context. 1.2 Uses active listening and empathetic communication to build rapport. |
2. Clinical Information Gathering and Interpretation | 2.1 Conducts a structured history to assess depressive symptoms, severity, and risk factors. |
3. Diagnosis, Decision-Making and Reasoning | 3.1 Uses DSM-5 criteria to diagnose depression and rule out differentials. |
4. Clinical Management and Therapeutic Reasoning | 4.1 Develops an evidence-based treatment plan incorporating pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies. |
5. Preventive and Population Health | 5.1 Provides psychoeducation and lifestyle modification advice to support mental health. |
6. Professionalism | 6.1 Maintains a non-judgemental, patient-centred approach, respecting autonomy. |
7. General Practice Systems and Regulatory Requirements | 7.1 Understands Medicare-funded mental health care plans and referral pathways. |
8. Procedural Skills | 8.1 Conducts validated mental health assessments (e.g., K10, DASS-21, PHQ-9). |
9. Managing Uncertainty | 9.1 Recognises when specialist referral is warranted (e.g., complex or treatment-resistant depression). |
10. Identifying and Managing the Patient with Significant Illness | 10.1 Assesses suicide risk and develops an appropriate safety plan. |
CASE FEATURES
- 29-year-old woman presenting with low mood, fatigue, and loss of interest for the past six weeks.
- Reports poor sleep, appetite changes, and difficulty concentrating at work.
- History of previous depressive episode in early 20s, managed with therapy.
- No current suicidal ideation but past self-harm history in teenage years.
- Stressors include work-related pressure and recent breakup.
- Requires assessment for clinical depression vs adjustment disorder and formulation of a management plan.
INSTRUCTIONS
Review the following patient record summary and scenario.
Your examiner will ask you a series of questions based on this information.
You have 15 minutes to complete this case.
The time for each question will be managed by the examiner.
The time allocation for each question is roughly as follows:
- Question 1 – 3 minutes
- Question 2 – 3 minutes
- Question 3 – 3 minutes
- Question 4 – 3 minutes
- Question 5 – 3 minutes
PATIENT RECORD SUMMARY
Patient Details
Name: Sarah Thompson
Age: 29
Gender: Female
Indigenous Status: Non-Indigenous
Allergies and Adverse Reactions
- Nil known
Medications
- Nil currently
- Past use of SSRIs (fluoxetine) during a previous depressive episode
Past History
- Depression at age 22, treated with psychotherapy (CBT) and fluoxetine for 12 months
- No history of psychiatric hospitalisation
Social History
- Works full-time as a marketing executive, reporting high workload stress
- Recently ended a four-year relationship
- Lives alone; limited social support
- No regular exercise, poor diet
- No current drug use
Family History
- Mother had postnatal depression
- Father has a history of alcohol dependence
Smoking
- Non-smoker
Alcohol
- 4-6 standard drinks per week, drinks more when stressed
Preventative Activities
- No recent mental health screening
- Up to date with general health check-ups
SCENARIO
Sarah Thompson, a 29-year-old woman, presents with persistent low mood, fatigue, and loss of motivation for the past six weeks. She reports difficulty concentrating at work and poor sleep quality, waking up frequently. She has reduced appetite, occasional tearfulness, and withdrawal from social activities.
She has a past history of depression, previously managed with fluoxetine and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), but is not currently on treatment. She recently ended a long-term relationship and feels overwhelmed at work.
She denies current suicidal ideation but admits to previous self-harm during her teenage years. She feels “stuck” and unsure how to cope.
On examination:
General Appearance: Well-groomed but appears tired and subdued
Speech: Normal rate and tone, monotonous at times
Mood/Affect: Reports low mood, restricted affect
Thought Process: Logical, no psychotic symptoms
Suicidal Ideation: Denies active intent but past self-harm history noted
Cognition: Mild concentration difficulties reported
INVESTIGATION FINDINGS
Pending investigations include:
- Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10): Score of 30 (high distress)
- DASS-21: Moderate depression and anxiety scores
- Routine bloods: Pending (to rule out organic causes such as hypothyroidism, anaemia)
EXAMINER ONLY INFORMATION
QUESTIONS
Q1. What additional history would you take to assess Sarah’s depressive symptoms?
- Prompt: What risk factors and psychosocial elements should be explored?
- Prompt: How would you assess suicidal risk?
Q2. What are the possible differential diagnoses, and how would you confirm the diagnosis?
- Prompt: How would you differentiate between major depressive disorder and adjustment disorder?
- Prompt: What role do screening tools play in diagnosis?
Q3. Outline your management plan for Sarah, including pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies.
- Prompt: Would you prescribe antidepressants at this stage?
- Prompt: What psychological interventions are recommended?
Q4. How would you address Sarah’s risk of deterioration and ensure appropriate follow-up?
- Prompt: What safety-netting strategies should be in place?
- Prompt: How frequently should she be reviewed?
Q5. Sarah returns in four weeks with worsening symptoms and passive suicidal thoughts. What would you do next?
- Prompt: What changes to her treatment plan are required?
- Prompt: When would referral to a psychiatrist be necessary?
THE COMPETENT CANDIDATE
The competent candidate should be able to:
Q1: What additional history would you take to assess Sarah’s depressive symptoms?
A comprehensive history is essential to assess Sarah’s depressive symptoms, identify underlying causes, and rule out differentials.
1. Symptom Exploration (DSM-5 Criteria for Major Depressive Disorder – MDD):
- Mood: Onset, duration, severity of low mood.
- Anhedonia: Loss of interest in previously enjoyed activities.
- Cognition: Difficulty concentrating, memory concerns.
- Energy levels and motivation: Fatigue, psychomotor changes.
- Sleep disturbances: Insomnia or hypersomnia.
- Appetite and weight changes: Loss or increase.
- Guilt and self-worth: Feelings of worthlessness or excessive guilt.
2. Suicide Risk Assessment:
- Current suicidal ideation? If yes, intent, plan, access to means.
- Past attempts? Methods, triggers, and outcomes.
- Protective factors? Family, relationships, goals.
3. Psychosocial Stressors:
- Breakup impact, workplace stress, financial or housing concerns.
- Social support network: Friends, family, hobbies.
4. Personal and Family Mental Health History:
- Previous depressive episodes, response to treatment.
- Family history of depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, or suicide.
5. Substance Use and Lifestyle Factors:
- Alcohol, drugs, caffeine, exercise levels.
6. Organic Causes Screening:
- Recent illnesses, medication changes, thyroid dysfunction, anaemia.
A structured approach ensures an accurate diagnosis and targeted management.
Q2: What are the possible differential diagnoses, and how would you confirm the diagnosis?
Sarah presents with low mood, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and concentration difficulties. Possible differentials include:
1. Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (Most Likely):
- Meets DSM-5 criteria (≥5 symptoms for ≥2 weeks, functional impairment).
- No history of manic episodes (excludes bipolar disorder).
2. Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood:
- Triggered by a clear stressor (breakup, work stress).
- Symptoms resolve within 6 months of stressor.
3. Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD):
- Excessive worry, restlessness, muscle tension.
- Overlaps with depression (can co-exist).
4. Hypothyroidism:
- Fatigue, weight gain, mood symptoms.
- Check TSH and free T4.
5. Anaemia:
- Fatigue, pallor, poor concentration.
- Check iron studies, FBC.
Diagnostic Tools:
- K10 Score (30 = high distress).
- DASS-21, PHQ-9 for severity assessment.
- Blood tests (TSH, FBC) to exclude organic causes.
Q3: Outline your management plan for Sarah, including pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies.
Management is holistic, addressing biological, psychological, and social factors.
1. Psychoeducation & Support:
- Explain depression as a treatable condition.
- Encourage engagement in therapy.
2. Psychological Therapy (First-Line):
- Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT): Address negative thinking.
- Interpersonal Therapy (IPT): Relationship stress focus.
- Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction.
3. Pharmacological Management:
- Consider SSRIs (e.g., sertraline, escitalopram) if:
- Symptoms are moderate-severe.
- Psychological therapy alone is insufficient.
- There is past SSRI response (fluoxetine).
- Monitor for side effects (nausea, agitation, sexual dysfunction).
4. Lifestyle & Self-Care Recommendations:
- Sleep hygiene: Limit screen time, bedtime routine.
- Exercise: At least 30 minutes, 5 days/week.
- Diet: Omega-3, reduced alcohol/caffeine.
- Social support: Encourage friend and family engagement.
5. Follow-Up & Safety Netting:
- Review in 1-2 weeks for risk reassessment.
- Create a safety plan if suicidal risk increases.
A multimodal approach is crucial for long-term improvement.
Q4: How would you address Sarah’s risk of deterioration and ensure appropriate follow-up?
Sarah has moderate depression with past self-harm history, requiring close monitoring.
1. Suicide Risk & Crisis Planning:
- Regular risk assessments at each visit.
- Encourage support seeking from family, friends.
- Provide Beyond Blue, Lifeline contacts (13 11 14).
- Discuss Emergency Plan (ED if acute suicidal crisis).
2. Structured Follow-Up Plan:
- Review in 1-2 weeks (earlier if worsening).
- Monitor therapy response, side effects if on SSRIs.
3. Referrals & Support:
- GP Mental Health Care Plan (Medicare-subsidised psychologist sessions).
- Consider psychiatrist referral if complex or treatment-resistant.
4. Address Lifestyle Factors:
- Alcohol reduction, physical activity, sleep hygiene.
Ensuring proactive follow-up reduces the risk of suicidal deterioration.
Q5: Sarah returns in four weeks with worsening symptoms and passive suicidal thoughts. What would you do next?
Sarah’s deterioration requires urgent reassessment and escalation of care.
1. Suicide Risk Reassessment:
- Passive or active ideation?
- Intent, plan, access to means?
- Previous suicide attempts?
- Protective factors?
2. Escalation of Care:
- Acute risk → Immediate ED referral (if suicidal intent).
- High risk → Crisis team or psychiatrist referral.
- Moderate risk → Increase GP review frequency, psychologist referral.
3. Pharmacological Adjustments:
- Optimise antidepressant dose if SSRI started.
- Consider medication switch (e.g., venlafaxine, mirtazapine if poor response).
- Monitor for SSRI-induced suicidality (early worsening risk).
4. Increase Psychological & Social Support:
- Engage family/friends in safety planning.
- Referral to social worker if financial or housing stressors.
5. Short-Term Monitoring:
- Next GP review in 3-5 days.
Rapid intervention can prevent crisis escalation.
SUMMARY OF A COMPETENT ANSWER
- Comprehensive history-taking covering symptoms, risk factors, and suicide assessment.
- Accurate differentiation of MDD vs adjustment disorder vs anxiety.
- Holistic management incorporating therapy, medication, and lifestyle.
- Structured follow-up and risk monitoring to prevent crisis escalation.
- Appropriate escalation to psychiatry or crisis services when required.
PITFALLS
- Failure to conduct a suicide risk assessment.
- Overlooking lifestyle and psychosocial factors in management.
- Inappropriate prescription of antidepressants without psychological support.
- Lack of structured follow-up and safety planning.
- Delaying referral when high-risk features present.
REFERENCES
MARKING
Each competency area is on the following scale from 0 to 3.
☐ Competency NOT demonstrated
☐ Competency NOT CLEARLY demonstrated
☐ Competency SATISFACTORILY demonstrated
☐ Competency FULLY demonstrated
Competency at Fellowship Level
☐ CLEARLY BELOW STANDARD
☐ BELOW EXPECTED STANDARD
☐ BORDERLINE
☐ AT EXPECTED STANDARD
☐ ABOVE STANDARD